Every Christmas Dinner Becomes an Academic Comparison. How I Stopped Dreading It.
My extended family's Christmas dinner was an annual academic ranking exercise. Here's how I stopped dreading December and started managing it.

By October, I start quietly dreading Christmas.
Not the presents, not the logistics, not even the weeks of my children requesting things I can't afford or won't buy. I dread the dinner. Specifically, I dread the forty-five-minute stretch after the main course when my mother's three siblings, their spouses, and the assembled parents of approximately eleven cousins conduct what I can only describe as an informal academic tribunal.
It begins innocently. Someone asks how the kids are doing in school. This is a reasonable question. Normal families can answer this question normally. My family cannot. The question is never actually a question; it's an opening bid. The answer will be benchmarked, immediately and publicly, against every other cousin's answer. By the time the mango pudding arrives, there will be a clear ranking, and everyone at the table will know it, and nobody will acknowledge that we have just spent forty minutes ranking children in front of those children.
For context: my children are not at the top of the ranking. This is not self-pity; it's data. My nephew is in a Band 1 school and doing well in it. One cousin is in a highly regarded DSS school. My kids are in decent local schools and are fine — not struggling, not distinguished, just fine. In a normal family, "fine" is perfectly acceptable. In my extended family's Christmas algebra, "fine" is a position, and it is not the first one.
For several years, my strategy was avoidance. I'd steer the conversation toward something else when the academic tribunal began — the political situation, travel plans, anything. This was only partially effective and exhausted me. I also tried the pre-emptive disclosure: bringing up my children's results myself, in as neutral a tone as possible, which removes others' ability to probe but which I found deeply dispiriting. I was still participating in the ranking. I'd just moved to managing my placement in it.
What I eventually landed on involved two shifts.
The first was internal: I had a genuine reckoning with why this dinner bothered me so much. Part of it was protective instinct — I didn't want my children to feel they were losing a competition they hadn't agreed to enter. But a significant part was my own ego. I wanted to be the parent of a child who performed well in public, and my children's "fine" outcomes reflected badly on me in a context where my own worth was still being assessed through them. That's my issue, not theirs. Sitting with that honestly changed something.
The second was practical: I started having conversations with my children before the dinner, every year, about what the dinner is and why adults behave the way they do.
I tell them — and they are old enough now to receive this fully — that some grown-ups measure love through achievement, because they were raised to believe that achievement is how you earn belonging. That the aunties and uncles who ask about school marks are not being cruel; they genuinely think this is how you show interest in a child. That comparing cousins is a kind of family bonding ritual, even when it's uncomfortable, and it tells us more about the generation that invented it than about the children being compared.
I tell my kids that their marks do not determine whether I love them, and I try to demonstrate this consistently for eleven months so the statement carries weight in December. I tell them that if someone asks about school in a way that feels like a ranking exercise, they are allowed to give a short answer and change the subject.
Last Christmas, my daughter was asked by one auntie how she'd done in her mid-year exams. She said "pretty well, thanks," and then asked the auntie how her garden was doing, because she'd heard there'd been a typhoon near the auntie's house. The auntie spent eight minutes talking about her garden. My daughter caught my eye across the table and did not smile, which meant she understood that she'd done something real.
I still dread the dinner, a little. The old anxiety is structural now; it fires automatically in October and I just have to ride it out. But I dread it less. The mango pudding is actually very good. My kids are increasingly capable of navigating adult absurdity with something approaching grace.
That's its own kind of performance. A better one, I think.

Anonymous HK parent. Self-described reformed tiger mum. Two kids in local primary in Sha Tin. Works in finance. Writes what other parents think but won't say out loud.
All articles by Tiger MaGet Wong's Tips Weekly
One practical tip every week — no spam, just useful stuff.
We'll only send tips. Unsubscribe anytime.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author alone and do not represent the views or positions of 補習天王 (Tutor Wong), its founders, staff, or team. This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice.
Keep Reading
When your child ends up at your third choice kindergarten: what actually happens
What happens when families land at their fallback kindergarten. The data on whether it actually matters. How children adapt and how parents take longer.
Ms. Poon4 minWhat Happens to the Other Child
What I observed across families where one child got into a top school and the sibling didn't — or where children were at very different academic levels.
Ms. Poon5 minWhat the DSE Year Does to a Family: Observations from a Teacher Who Has Seen It from Both Sides
The DSE year changes family dynamics in ways most people don't anticipate. A secondary teacher who has taught through many of them explains what he sees.
Mr. Ng4 min